SEC’s New Chair Paul Atkins Declares War on Crypto Confusion: Calls for Clear, Modern Rules

In a strong pivot from the previous administration’s stance, Paul Atkins, the newly appointed Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), is making it clear: crypto regulation in the U.S. is overdue for a reset. Speaking at the SEC’s Crypto Task Force roundtable on April 25, Atkins laid out a bold agenda aimed at creating clear, innovation-friendly rules for the blockchain and digital asset ecosystem.

Atkins’ remarks signal a potential new era of collaboration and regulatory clarity in Washington — one that sharply contrasts with the enforcement-heavy regime of former Chair Gary Gensler.

Atkins’ Vision: Clear Rules, Open Dialogue, and Innovation

“Regulation Needs Urgent Attention”

Atkins did not mince words when assessing the state of crypto regulation in the U.S.

“The current framework for Bitcoin and crypto badly needs attention,” he said.

The new chair emphasized that entrepreneurs are building real solutions with blockchain, with the potential to dramatically improve financial infrastructure — but regulatory confusion has slowed them down.

From cost-efficiency to risk mitigation and transparency, Atkins noted the transformational promise of blockchain — if given room to grow within a rational legal framework.

A Stark Critique of the Gensler Era

Atkins directly criticized his predecessor, Gary Gensler, blaming the previous SEC administration for creating an environment of uncertainty that stifled innovation.

“Innovation unfortunately has been stifled for the last several years,” Atkins said, noting that market participants have struggled under regulatory ambiguity.

This rebuke resonates deeply with many in the crypto industry, which has long argued that Gensler’s SEC favored regulation by enforcement rather than offering concrete compliance paths.

Aligning With Trump’s Crypto Agenda

Engaging the Executive Branch

Atkins made it clear that he plans to work closely with President Donald Trump’s administration, which has increasingly shown pro-crypto leanings. He stated his intent to collaborate with fellow regulators and stakeholders to build a fit-for-purpose framework that recognizes the unique structure of crypto assets.

The new SEC leadership’s tone aligns with Trump’s broader push to make the U.S. a global crypto innovation hub, with multiple enforcement actions against major crypto players like Binance, Ripple, and OpenSea already being softened or dropped.

Hester Peirce — The Crypto Ally Inside the SEC

Atkins also praised SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce, widely known in the crypto community as “Crypto Mom.” Her consistent advocacy for fair and balanced crypto regulation has earned her respect from both industry leaders and policymakers.

“Commissioner Peirce is the right person to lead the effort to come up with a rational, regulatory framework for crypto assets,” Atkins said.

By elevating Peirce’s influence within the Commission, Atkins signals a collaborative, industry-aware approach to future policymaking.

Inside the Roundtable: Know Your Custodian

The Focus: Digital Asset Custody

The roundtable, titled “Know Your Custodian,” brought together regulators, crypto companies, legal experts, and market participants to discuss how digital assets should be held, secured, and regulated.

A key consensus emerged: The SEC must move away from overly prescriptive rules that may unintentionally cripple innovation.

Speakers advocated for a principles-based, tech-neutral approach that gives firms flexibility while maintaining strong investor protections.

Key Issues Raised:

• Custody Definitions: Who qualifies as a “custodian” under the SEC and Investment Advisers Act? Should only banks and broker-dealers be allowed, or can specialized crypto firms also qualify?

• Technology Requirements: Should the SEC dictate hot vs. cold storage ratios, or allow market participants to design their own secure custody systems?

• Proof-of-Reserve Protocols: How can the industry self-regulate transparency without being hamstrung by outdated financial infrastructure?

• Custodial vs. SaaS Models: How do non-custodial solutions and software providers fit into the regulatory architecture?

These conversations are vital as institutional adoption of crypto continues to rise — and clarity around custody is a top concern for CFOs, CIOs, and compliance officers in the space.

Why This Matters for Crypto CEOs, Founders, and Investors

1. A New Era of Constructive Regulation May Be Here

Atkins’ statements offer hope that the “regulation by enforcement” era is ending, replaced by open dialogue and modern frameworks that acknowledge crypto’s unique structure. This may ease compliance costs, reduce litigation risks, and improve investor confidence.

2. Institutional Investment Hinges on Custody Clarity

Custody is not just a technical issue — it’s a regulatory linchpin. Until clear guidelines are issued on who can custody crypto and how, institutions remain hesitant to fully engage with digital assets. A framework developed under Atkins could unlock billions in new investment.

3. Crypto Firms Should Prepare to Collaborate, Not Just Defend

The tone of the roundtable suggests that constructive engagement with regulators is finally being rewarded. For crypto firms, this is a green light to participate in policy design — not just push back against enforcement. Strategic legal teams and forward-thinking compliance will be key.

SEC Signals It’s Ready to Listen — and Lead

Paul Atkins has taken over the SEC with a clear mandate to fix what’s broken in America’s crypto regulation. By criticizing the past, empowering reformers like Hester Peirce, and opening dialogue with the private sector, Atkins has laid the groundwork for policy that supports — not smothers — innovation.

The industry’s next challenge? Showing up to the table, offering thoughtful input, and preparing to build a crypto regulatory model that works — not just for the U.S., but as a global standard.

Disclaimer: The above press release has been provided by a third party. We do not verify or endorse the content and will not be responsible for any inaccuracies, claims, or damages arising from the same.